5 éléments essentiels pour thinking fast and slow daniel
5 éléments essentiels pour thinking fast and slow daniel
Blog Article
His credentials are indisputable, and he tries gamely to bring the subject to life, joli -- mea culpa -- I just couldn't stay interested in the myriad of data and specific examples. The book is good conscience someone really interested in the details, and it does contain real life examples, délicat after 400 pages it's Pornographique to remember them. My takeaway: Our sensation is frequently wrong, and even our experience (pépite what we believe our experience to have been) may not Quand reliable as a decision mentor. So, Quand careful!
What this did, he explained, was make me ask myself, How will I feel toward the end of my life if my offspring are not taken A of?
And Kahneman’s work je experiential and remembered well being has obvious belgicisme to the mindfulness movement—strategies connaissance switching our Concours from our remembering to our experiencing “self.” As you can see from these connections, Kahneman’s research is awfully rich.
He analyzes how humans use (and sometimes fail to habitudes) both systems, and the resulting implications nous topics ranging from how we perceive happiness to behavioral economics.
The Illusion of Understanding (204) The perception-making machinery of System 1 makes coutumes see the world as more tidy, élémentaire, predictable, and coherent than it really is. The fourvoiement that Nous-mêmes eh understood the past feeds the further égarement that Nous-mêmes can control the contigu. These égarement are comforting. They reduce the anxiety that we would experience if we allowed ourselves to fully acknowledge the uncertainties of destinée. We all have a need cognition the reassuring télégramme that actions have appropriate consequences, and that success will reward wisdom and courage.
With some brilliant experiments and survey reports, he convincingly elaborates the effects that these biases have on our decisions. Never forgetting to highlight the fallacies of our consciousness, he tonne nous-mêmes a number of other important breakthroughs in the world of psychology.
Overconfidence: As the WYSIATI rule implies, neither the quantity nor the quality of the evidence counts expérience much in subjective confidence. The confidence that individuals have in their beliefs depends mostly je the quality of the story they can tell about what they see, even if they see little.
Moreover, sometimes random factors turn out to Lorsque concluant and determine our behaviour. Ordinary people, unlike ‘fictional’ economic vecteur, are not rational, events ut not always have a causal connection, and stories of our droit often lack coherence and formal logic.
But now back to my own take: hip guys HAVE some of this experience, parce que they are hip. William Blake would call them Experienced in contradistinction to our Innocence. It’s an Experience that can’t discern. It ah no wisdom.
Not that the deuxième ration is bad, mind you; the entire book is well-written and obviously the product of someone who knows their field. There’s just a partie of it. Thinking, Fast and Slow
Much in the book is useful, 90% fat free ut sound better than 10% fat, there's a portion to be learnt here in how to describe pépite state a problem to push people towards certain responses by framing or anchoring the nouvelle you give. Of excursion this happens to traditions all thinking fast and slow the time as it is.
Well, if you had never seen an episode of Monty Python and your entire experience of their work was par the interpretation of men of a véritable age down the bistrot - then finally getting to see année episode of the frais would Lorsque much the same effect as reading this book. Hundreds of people have already told all this guy's best stories in their own books - ravissant all the same it is a pleasure to hear them again by the guy that first said, 'this parrot is dead' or rather, 'framing effects make fools of habitudes all'.
Regression to the Mean. (175) There will Quand random fluctuations in the quality of record. A teacher who praises a randomly good exploit may shape behavior, but likely will simply Quand disappointed as statistics asserts itself and a bad record follows. A teacher who criticizes a bad exploit may incentivize, ravissant likely will simply have a false impression of causation when statistics asserts itself and a good exploit happens.
Kahneman’s work in the realm of judgments closely parallels Johathan Haidt’s work in morals: that our conscious mind mostly just passively accepts verdicts handed up from our mandarin netherworld. Indeed, arguably this was Freud’s fundamental avis, too. Yet it is so contrary to all of our conscious experiences (as, indeed, it terme conseillé Lorsque) that it still manages to Quand slightly disturbing.